We felt this should be posted

We received this email from one of our readers and felt it should be posted.

Sexuality should, in my opinion, be private.
It should be a non-issue.
Fem, and Hyper-male stuff is just "acting out". It is an act of
passive-aggression.
People need to learn how to have a well integrated personality of their very
own--instead of acting out a character. (Or in my own personal venacular:
being a cartoon.)
I think the focus should be to give young people the understanding that they
themselves must be complete before they start engaging in intimacy of any
kind. They need to learn how to have healthy relationships with others as
individuals and have a comfortability in themselves before adding sexuality
to the mix. So many people that I have met lack the self-restraint and
completeness which is necessary for a comfortable partnership with another
human being regardless of sexuality.
It is nothing less than a tragedy--again the sexuality means nothing in
this.
I have known a few very flamboyant characters--which admittedly scared the
crap out of me. They did it on purpose. It kept people at a distance and
headed off any rejection. The rejection they were most frightened of was
not of their sexuality, but of THEM. Two different deals. Pain in both.
I've caused myself great injury in the past, and will slip into old
passive-aggressive behavior without even realizing it. A terrible flaw, a
crippling defect of character, based upon fear, anger, and rage.
Even though I'm "straight" and have always been--the "gay-pride" stuff I
have seen in action has been the reflection of these same flaws. It tatters
the fabric of civility, it divides the community, and causes distress and
confusion amongst the young. I do not believe that sexuality is complete
until people reach their twenties--a childhood "crush" has been turned into
a life sentence. This is totally unfair to the young.
The few people that I have known over the years which were complete,
comfortable people were gender innocuous--that is to say that the
personality and other aspects of their character were very much in the
foreground. They could turn the sensual aspect of their character on and
off like a light bulb; and that side of their character was no one's
business but their own. Each and every one of those rare individuals were
worthy of emulation.
Outward behavior is important--in the end it is all anyone has to decide
whether to associate, befriend, or hire someone. That is where the focus
should be--along with private things remaining comfortably private.
I am convinced that Rhonda Storms was elected and re-elected strictly for
entertainment value and nothing else. She is the South Hillborough County
answer to the powers-that-be in south Tampa that run everything. The
WWF-Wrestler is a pathetic puppet, with daddy well connected with the
"good-ole-boys". I really wanted "Dave the Dwarf" to win-if only for the
name value. The people who really cared about the county didn't have a
chance.